<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Oracle ULA contract agreement risk factors</title> <atom:link href="http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/</link> <description>Tips and tricks, common issues and speciality topics around Oracle licensingionals.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Software Licensing Made SimpleEnterprise Software Agreements &#124; Aber Law Firm</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link> <dc:creator>Software Licensing Made SimpleEnterprise Software Agreements &#124; Aber Law Firm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:39:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-110</guid> <description>[...] 4) What Not to Do. I have seen some software companies simply provide a site or unlimited license as their enterprise software agreement and call it a day. Now maybe this is the right answer for your company, but I suggest you are not being adequately compensated for this type license. The problem I have with unlimited or site licenses, is how do you define the company or site? What happens when the customer is &#160;acquired or merges with another company? You can get into some really complex drafting &#160;what are called &#039;change of control clauses&#039; to avoid this issue, but I don&#039;t think you want that level of complexity (unless the deal is really large). By the way, most large software vendors rarely license on a site or unlimited basis, and if they do it is often a term license. Here is an example of one.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4) What Not to Do. I have seen some software companies simply provide a site or unlimited license as their enterprise software agreement and call it a day. Now maybe this is the right answer for your company, but I suggest you are not being adequately compensated for this type license. The problem I have with unlimited or site licenses, is how do you define the company or site? What happens when the customer is &nbsp;acquired or merges with another company? You can get into some really complex drafting &nbsp;what are called &#039;change of control clauses&#039; to avoid this issue, but I don&#039;t think you want that level of complexity (unless the deal is really large). By the way, most large software vendors rarely license on a site or unlimited basis, and if they do it is often a term license. Here is an example of one.  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Enterprise Software Agreements: How to Design Yours &#124; Sandhill</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link> <dc:creator>Enterprise Software Agreements: How to Design Yours &#124; Sandhill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:21:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-108</guid> <description>[...] By the way, most large software vendors rarely license on a site or unlimited basis, and if they do it is often a term license. Here is an example of one. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By the way, most large software vendors rarely license on a site or unlimited basis, and if they do it is often a term license. Here is an example of one. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel Hesselink</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Hesselink</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:08:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-105</guid> <description>Hi Robyn,that doesn&#039;t exist. There&#039;s a tool to monitor usage, but you still have to assign licenses. We&#039;re working on an online solution for license assignment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robyn,</p><p>that doesn&#8217;t exist. There&#8217;s a tool to monitor usage, but you still have to assign licenses. We&#8217;re working on an online solution for license assignment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robyn Kelly</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link> <dc:creator>Robyn Kelly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-104</guid> <description>Has anyone found a discovery tool that would monitor how many db licenses are being used in their environment?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone found a discovery tool that would monitor how many db licenses are being used in their environment?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Enterprise Software Agreement: How to Design Yours! &#124; OpenView Blog</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link> <dc:creator>Enterprise Software Agreement: How to Design Yours! &#124; OpenView Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:23:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-98</guid> <description>[...] 4) What Not to Do. I have seen some software companies simply provide a site or unlimited license as their enterprise software agreement and call it a day. Now maybe this is the right answer for your company, but I suggest you may not be adequately compensated for this type of license. The problem I have with unlimited or site licenses is, how do you define the company or site? What happens when the customer is acquired or merges with another company? You can get into some really complex drafting and what are called ‘change of control clauses‘ to avoid this issue, but I don’t think you want that level of complexity (unless the deal is really large). By the way, most large software vendors rarely license on a site or unlimited basis, and if they do it is often a term license. Here is an example of one. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4) What Not to Do. I have seen some software companies simply provide a site or unlimited license as their enterprise software agreement and call it a day. Now maybe this is the right answer for your company, but I suggest you may not be adequately compensated for this type of license. The problem I have with unlimited or site licenses is, how do you define the company or site? What happens when the customer is acquired or merges with another company? You can get into some really complex drafting and what are called ‘change of control clauses‘ to avoid this issue, but I don’t think you want that level of complexity (unless the deal is really large). By the way, most large software vendors rarely license on a site or unlimited basis, and if they do it is often a term license. Here is an example of one. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel Hesselink</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Hesselink</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 15:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-92</guid> <description>No downside there for uncapped ULA... In fact this is what you want!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No downside there for uncapped ULA&#8230; In fact this is what you want!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 20:17:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-91</guid> <description>In your last example, what if you WAY over deployed?  Like say 5x the amount?  Are there any additional penalties or downsides to that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your last example, what if you WAY over deployed?  Like say 5x the amount?  Are there any additional penalties or downsides to that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel Hesselink</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Hesselink</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:46:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-74</guid> <description>Hi Ed,Sorry for the late reply but i must have missed it. No there&#039;s no real history about it. But Oracle does have the history of simply not accepting a client&#039;s confirmation at the end of a ULA and doing some sort of verification. Cheers, Daniel</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p><p>Sorry for the late reply but i must have missed it.<br /> No there&#8217;s no real history about it. But Oracle does have the history of simply not accepting a client&#8217;s confirmation at the end of a ULA and doing some sort of verification.<br /> Cheers,<br /> Daniel</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed B</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link> <dc:creator>Ed B</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:18:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-56</guid> <description>HiIs there any history of Oracle conducting audits shortly after the end of ULA agreements? It seems to me that given the difficulty in making the information in the confirmation document accurate there would be a good chance of Oracle finding mistakes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>Is there any history of Oracle conducting audits shortly after the end of ULA agreements? It seems to me that given the difficulty in making the information in the confirmation document accurate there would be a good chance of Oracle finding mistakes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M-A-O-L &#187; Oracle Licensing</title><link>http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/2010/03/08/oracle-ula-contract-agreement-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link> <dc:creator>M-A-O-L &#187; Oracle Licensing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.licenseconsulting.eu/?p=118#comment-22</guid> <description>[...] methods of Oracle and other Database vendors, to some extent. Good posts to start with are  Oracle ULA contract agreement risk factors and The Oracle Support Recalculation [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] methods of Oracle and other Database vendors, to some extent. Good posts to start with are  Oracle ULA contract agreement risk factors and The Oracle Support Recalculation [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 355/355 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.licenseconsulting.eu @ 2012-02-05 12:21:51 -->
